21st GiESCO International Meeting: ‘A Multidisciplinary Vision towards Sustainable Viticulture’ SURVEY REVEALS TRAINING NEEDS FOR AIRBLAST SPRAYER OPERATORS 1* 2 3 4

Lynn WUNDERLICH , Franz NIEDERHOLZER , Lisa BLECKER , Rhonda J. SMITH , Stephanie BOLTON 5 1 UCCE, 311 Fair Lane, Placerville, California, 95667 USA. UCCE, P.O. Box 180, 100 Sunrise Blvd., Colusa, California, 95932 USA. 3 UCIPM, 2801 Second St., Davis, California, 95618 USA. 4 UCCE, 133 Aviation Blvd. Santa Rosa, California, 95403 USA. 5 Lodi Winegrape Commission, 2545 Turner Rd., Lodi, California, 95242 USA. 2 *Corresponding author:lrwunderlich@ucanr.edu

Abstract: Context and purpose of the study – In California, little training in sprayer calibration or pesticide drift management is required to apply pesticides. Yet, there is a need to maximize pesticide efficacy and minimize drift. Therefore, our team is developing a training course on airblast application best practices. We distributed a survey to identify current practices and used importance-performance analysis to interpret responses to the importance of spray related topics and satisfaction with previous training. Material and methods – In 2018 we solicited survey replies, receiving 219 responses from winegrape and orchard industry members. Respondents rated 18 spray topics using a Likert-type scale. Topic categories included sprayer calibration, weather, techniques to reduce drift, and applicator attitude. Respondents rated 1) how important each topic is to them and 2) how satisfied they are with the quality of training they had previously received; or “no training received”. Results were calculated by topic as the mean importance (y) and satisfaction with training (x), and graphed using (x,y) as coordinates. The overall importance and performance means were used to define graph quadrants; the resulting topic placement in the quadrants prioritized training needs. We also asked: “Do you change your sprayer set up?”, “What steps do you take to calibrate?” and “Have you experienced a pest control failure that could have been related to a poor spray application?” Results – Checking spray coverage ranked the most important topic while improving safety ranked highest for satisfaction. Topics fell into quadrants: 1.-high priority: checking coverage, selecting nozzles, reducing costs, and measuring flow; 2.-less emphasis: measuring application rate, measuring speed, improving safety, checking wind speed, reducing drift, and checking pressure; 3.-low interest: reducing spray loss to the ground, adjusting air flow, determining droplet size, checking temperature, determining if an inversion exists, using the low-drift technique “Gear up, Throttle down”, and checking relative humidity; 4.-low priority: checking wind direction. Responses to “What steps do you take to calibrate?” included measuring speed (44.9%), spraying out the tank to a known area (35.6%) and checking nozzles (34.7%). Only 8.1% of respondents check coverage and 5.9% admitted not calibrating or not often. 38% do not change their sprayer set-up once the season begins. Over half experienced a pest control failure they suspect was due to poor application; grape powdery mildew had the highest perceived failure. Respondents understand drift is undesirable but assign less importance to practices to reduce drift incidence, possibly due to lack of training received by 6-23%. Our course will focus on high priority topics; and checking weather and equipment to minimize drift.

Keywords: Airblast sprayer, calibration, training, survey
Réservé aux membres / Members only

Devenir membre / Membership